What Trump Is Really Doing With Iran.

T
The Rest Is Politics Feb 05, 2026

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode explores the severe risks of regime change in Iran, the rise of legalistic autocracy in Europe, and the global nuclear proliferation dangers stemming from unstable US foreign policy. There are four key takeaways from this discussion. First, removing authoritarian leaders often leads to either military juntas or total state collapse rather than democracy. Second, organizations like the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are not just military units but massive economic conglomerates, making surgical removal impossible. Third, modern autocracy often uses lawyers and legislation rather than violence to capture the state. Finally, current geopolitical instability is incentivizing middle powers to pursue their own nuclear deterrents. Let’s examine these points in detail. When analyzing potential intervention in Iran, Washington hawks often debate two flawed outcomes. The Venezuela Model involves decapitating the political leadership while leaving the military and bureaucracy intact, which typically results in a military junta. The alternative is the Iraq Model, which topples the entire apparatus, creating a power vacuum that breeds civil war and extremism. Neither path historically produces a stable democracy, and the assumption that any successor must be better than the current regime is a dangerous fallacy. A critical complication in Iran is the economic dominance of the Revolutionary Guard Corps. The IRGC is frequently misunderstood as merely a military force, but it functions as a massive business empire controlling ports, construction, and trade monopolies. You cannot simply remove the regime leadership without dismantling the country's financial infrastructure. Any attempt to strike the IRGC is effectively a strike against the Iranian economy itself. Furthermore, the regime operates under a siege mentality, believing that any reform or sign of weakness will lead to their violent overthrow, which hardens their resolve against compromise. Shifting to Europe, the discussion highlights a distinct form of state capture exemplified by Viktor Orbán in Hungary. Unlike Russian oligarchs who often started as gangsters, the Hungarian model is driven by legalistic corruption. The state nationalizes private industries and re-privatizes them to loyalists who have no independent power base. This creates a protected class of allies running media and universities. By using the law rather than breaking it, these regimes erode democratic checks without requiring the overt violence seen in traditional dictatorships. These authoritarian movements often rely on immigration as a total political weapon. Leaders use immigration as a skeleton key to justify exceptional powers across security, culture, and the economy simultaneously. This triangulation allows populists to claim a moral mandate for overriding constitutional norms. Finally, the conversation turns to the nuclear landscape. We are moving from an era of controlled non-proliferation to a survivalist free-for-all. As US security guarantees appear increasingly unreliable, powers like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt may conclude that disarmament leads to invasion, as seen in Ukraine and Libya. This dynamic risks triggering a cascade where every middle power rushes to acquire a nuclear bomb for self-preservation. Ultimately, the complex entanglement of military power with economic control and the rise of sophisticated legal autocracy suggests that traditional Western intervention strategies are becoming increasingly obsolete and dangerous.

Episode Overview

  • The Dangers of Regime Change: The episode explores the potentially catastrophic consequences of intervening in Iran, contrasting the "Venezuela Model" (changing the leader but keeping the system) with the "Iraq Model" (total collapse and anarchy).
  • The Rise of "Legalistic" Autocracy: Discussion shifts to how modern authoritarianism works, specifically looking at Hungary's Viktor Orbán, who uses laws and lawyers rather than violence to capture the state and economy.
  • Global Populist Strategies: The hosts analyze how right-wing movements globally (from Trump to Orbán) share a playbook that uses immigration as a wedge issue to justify exceptional powers and erode democratic checks.
  • Nuclear Proliferation Risks: A critical look at how US unpredictability and the potential collapse of Iran could trigger a "free-for-all" nuclear arms race among middle powers like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt.

Key Concepts

  • The "Venezuela" vs. "Iraq" Regime Change Models: Washington hawks often debate two outcomes for Iran. The Venezuela Model decapitates the leadership (like removing Maduro) but leaves the "deep state" (military, bureaucracy) intact to maintain order, often resulting in a military junta. The Iraq/Libya Model topples the entire apparatus, creating a power vacuum that breeds civil war and extremism. Both outcomes historically fail to produce democracy.

  • The IRGC as an Economic Conglomerate: The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is often misunderstood as merely a military force. In reality, it is a massive business conglomerate controlling ports, construction, and trade monopolies. You cannot simply "remove" the regime leadership because the IRGC is the economy; dismantling them means dismantling the country's financial infrastructure.

  • State Capture via "Legalistic Corruption": Unlike Russian oligarchs who often started as gangsters capturing the state, the "Hungarian Model" (seen under Orbán) is led by lawyers. The state nationalizes private industries and re-privatizes them to loyalists with no independent power base. This creates a protected class of allies running media and universities without requiring the overt violence seen in other dictatorships.

  • The Nuclear Proliferation Cascade: We are moving from an era of controlled non-proliferation to a survivalist "free-for-all." If Iran is attacked or rushes for a bomb, neighboring powers (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt) will likely conclude that US security guarantees are worthless. The lesson learned from Ukraine and Libya is that disarmament leads to invasion, incentivizing every middle power to acquire their own nuclear deterrent.

  • Immigration as a "Total" Political Weapon: Modern right-wing populism uses immigration not just as a policy issue, but as a "skeleton key" for governance. It simultaneously justifies security crackdowns, cultural defense narratives, and economic protectionism. This triangulation allows leaders to claim "exceptional powers" that override constitutional checks, creating a moral justification for authoritarianism.

Quotes

  • At 4:32 - "This is not even Iraq. This is definitely not Venezuela. This is something that has the capacity to provoke all sorts of problems within the region." - Alastair Campbell explaining why the sheer scale of Iran’s military and the Revolutionary Guard makes a direct conflict significantly more dangerous than recent US interventions.
  • At 11:36 - "For the Hawks, they think, 'Okay, anything that follows has got to be better'... I of course get the heebie-jeebies because that's of course what we thought with Saddam Hussein... 'It can't possibly be worse.'" - Rory Stewart on the dangerous fallacy of interventionism—the assumption that removing a 'bad' leader automatically results in a 'good' outcome.
  • At 12:50 - "What is happening in Iran now says to other countries about the likelihood, or the desire, of them to acquire nuclear weapons... The only way you can actually look after yourself is, genuinely, to go for your own nuclear weapons program." - Alastair Campbell on how US foreign policy is inadvertently incentivizing a global nuclear arms race.
  • At 18:50 - "If we give an inch, we're going to be strung up from the lamp posts because everybody knows we have blood on our hands." - Rory Stewart explaining the psychology of the Iranian regime, noting they cannot reform because they fear any sign of weakness will lead to their violent overthrow.
  • At 19:16 - "We think of them [The Revolutionary Guard] as an oversized special forces group. They're also a massive business... they run the ports, they run construction... they've got trade monopolies." - Alastair Campbell clarifying that the Iranian regime is deeply embedded in the economy, making "surgical" regime change impossible.
  • At 30:03 - "It's not like Russian corruption where the oligarchs were essentially self-made gangsters... This is the other way around. These are people who have no independent power base... they've just been given government contracts." - Rory Stewart distinguishing the Hungarian model of state-sponsored cronyism from the Russian model of gangster-capitalism.
  • At 35:45 - "Immigration gives you an argument about security, and culture, and the economy, and identity, and it justifies the exceptional powers... and it gives you a moral dimension." - Rory Stewart synthesizing why immigration remains the most effective tool for right-wing populist movements to consolidate power.

Takeaways

  • Evaluate Foreign Intervention Through the Lens of the "Day After": When assessing proposals for regime change (like in Iran), look past the removal of the dictator. Ask whether the plan accounts for the deep state bureaucracy (Venezuela model) or risks a total vacuum (Iraq model).
  • Recognize Economic Entanglement in Authoritarian Regimes: Understand that sanctions or military strikes against groups like the IRGC aren't just military actions; they are economic disruptors that can collapse a nation's ability to function, as these groups often run utilities, construction, and trade.
  • Identify "Legalistic" Autocracy: Be vigilant against corruption that follows the law rather than breaks it. Watch for governments that nationalize private assets only to sell them back to political allies, effectively capturing the state without violence.
  • Understand the Populist "Triangulation" Strategy: Recognize when political leaders use a single issue (like immigration) to justify radical changes in three separate areas: security laws, economic policy, and cultural identity. This is a deliberate tactic to consolidate executive power.