Europe vs. Trump: Competing Visions for a Ukraine Peace Deal

T
The Rest Is Politics Nov 25, 2025

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode examines Europe's strategic vulnerabilities and the significant threat of Russian influence in British politics, highlighted by a recent scandal. Three key takeaways emerge from this discussion. First, Europe must prepare for greater security independence. The continent has strategically miscalculated by assuming unwavering US support against threats like Russia, particularly given the potential for a Trump presidency to withdraw aid for Ukraine. This reliance leaves Europe unprepared for a significant shift in US foreign policy. Second, Russian influence in European politics is a subtle yet systemic national security threat. The conviction of Reform UK's Nathan Gill for accepting payments from a pro-Russian network highlights this. Gill’s actions, involving paid advocacy in the European Parliament, demonstrate how seemingly minor figures can be targets in Russia's geopolitical strategy to corrupt and undermine Western democracies. Third, the media often fails to adequately cover critical national security stories, prioritizing other narratives. The British media largely overlooked the Nathan Gill scandal, a major story of foreign influence and crime, instead focusing on more sensational political developments. This oversight represents a chronic failure to scrutinize significant geopolitical and security issues. That concludes this briefing on Europe's evolving geopolitical landscape and the challenges of foreign influence and media scrutiny.

Episode Overview

  • The episode analyzes Europe's precarious geopolitical position, highlighting its strategic miscalculation in assuming unwavering US support against Russia, especially with the potential for a Trump presidency to withdraw aid for Ukraine.
  • It exposes the significant national security threat of Russian influence in British politics, focusing on the conviction of Reform UK's Nathan Gill for accepting payments from a pro-Russian network.
  • The hosts express deep frustration with the UK media for failing to adequately cover the Nathan Gill scandal, instead prioritizing more sensational political narratives.
  • The discussion broadens to cover the subtle and systemic nature of foreign corruption, the ineffectiveness of international bodies in solving global inequality, and the diplomatic maneuvering between the US, EU, and Russia over Ukraine's future.

Key Concepts

  • Europe's Strategic Miscalculation: A central theme is the European delusion that the United States is fundamentally on its side against Russia, leaving the continent unprepared for a potential shift in US foreign policy.
  • The Trump Threat to Ukraine: The potential for a Donald Trump presidency to withdraw crucial military, intelligence, and security support for Ukraine, forcing a pro-Russian settlement.
  • Russian Influence in European Politics: The systematic effort by Russia to corrupt and influence far-right political parties across Europe to undermine Western democracies.
  • The Nathan Gill / Reform UK Scandal: The specific case of Nathan Gill, a senior figure in Reform UK, being convicted for accepting payments from pro-Russian oligarchs to make speeches in the European Parliament.
  • Media Failure: A critique of the British media's failure to give the Nathan Gill story the scrutiny it deserves as a major national security and crime story, instead focusing on narratives like Nigel Farage's political ambitions.
  • US-Russia Diplomatic Maneuvering: Analysis of a leaked "US-Russia paper" proposing a peace deal for Ukraine, which is dismissed as a diplomatic feeler rather than a concrete plan.
  • Global Inequality and Inaction: Skepticism towards the effectiveness of international panels on global issues, noting that inequality is worsening while major governments are cutting international development budgets.

Quotes

  • At 0:00 - "This is the fundamental problem that the Europeans have had from the beginning, which is believing that the Americans are on the European side." - In the opening teaser, Rory Stewart outlines what he sees as Europe's core strategic miscalculation regarding the US and Russia.
  • At 0:07 - "Trump is very much in the Putin camp." - In the teaser, Rory Stewart offers a blunt assessment of Donald Trump's geopolitical alignment.
  • At 0:22 - "A moment is going to come where the United States at best will walk away, but more likely will say, we're not providing key weapons... we're not providing intelligence and security... because we want to force the Russian position. And at that point, we're not ready." - In the teaser, Rory Stewart warns that Europe is unprepared for a potential shift in US policy toward Ukraine under a Trump presidency.
  • At 3:20 - "I think you're doing it a huge service by calling it a plan... I think you mean the US-Russia 28-point paper. I think you'd be struggling to call it a plan." - Alastair Campbell downplays the significance of the leaked US-Russia document proposing a peace deal for Ukraine, reframing it as a less formal "paper."
  • At 26:34 - "All the figures are the inequality is getting worse. And in fact, the British government has massacred its international development budget... The US government has wiped out its international development assistance." - Rory Stewart expresses his pessimism about a new global inequality panel, highlighting that aid budgets are being cut while inequality rises.
  • At 29:19 - "Nathan Gill should by now be a household name on a par with the spies of the past... Philby has gone into British historical legend." - Alastair Campbell expresses his astonishment that the Nathan Gill story has not become a major public scandal.
  • At 29:43 - "That is a total, chronic failure of our media who have chosen that because their chosen narrative right now is 'Farage on route for power', to overlook virtually one of the most significant political, diplomatic, security, and crime stories of modern times." - Alastair Campbell condemns the media's lack of coverage regarding Nathan Gill's conviction and its implications for Reform UK.
  • At 32:15 - "What they got him to do was to read out speeches in the European Parliament defending this media enterprise. So it's basically a pro-Russian media operation that was running in Ukraine... and for which he gets money." - Rory Stewart explains the specifics of Nathan Gill's actions, which involved taking money to advocate for a pro-Russian media outlet in Ukraine.
  • At 32:25 - "But that just shows you the fact that Putin takes an interest in this... this is a strategic interest for them. Putin taking an interest in the corruption of a Welsh member of the European Parliament." - Alastair Campbell emphasizes the strategic importance Russia places on influencing even seemingly minor political figures in Europe.
  • At 33:08 - "It might be worth asking some questions about some other people from Nathan Gill's party who were also making speeches in the European Parliament in favour of the same pro-Russian media organization." - Rory Stewart suggests the investigation into Russian influence should not be limited to Nathan Gill, as others were involved in similar activities.

Takeaways

  • Prepare for European security independence, as unwavering US support against threats like Russia can no longer be taken for granted.
  • Scrutinize media priorities and seek out information on stories that may be overlooked, especially those concerning national security and foreign influence.
  • Recognize that modern foreign corruption is often subtle, manifesting as paid advocacy and lobbying rather than overt espionage.
  • Hold political parties accountable for the actions of their members, particularly when they involve accepting influence from hostile foreign powers.
  • Understand that even seemingly minor political figures can be targets of major geopolitical strategy, making local political integrity a national security issue.
  • Interpret diplomatic "plans" and papers critically, understanding they are often tools for negotiation and influence rather than finalized agreements.