Why the sun is conscious (and the scientific revolution made a mistake) | Rupert Sheldrake
Audio Brief
Show transcript
This episode covers the historical belief in conscious celestial bodies, contrasting it with modern materialism and exploring panpsychism as a framework to reconsider cosmic consciousness.
There are three key takeaways from this discussion.
First, the materialist worldview, which views the cosmos as inanimate, is a relatively recent perspective, not a universal truth. Ancient cultures broadly regarded the sun and planets as conscious, often divine beings.
Second, panpsychism offers a lens to broaden our understanding of consciousness beyond biological brains. This philosophical concept suggests consciousness is a fundamental feature of reality.
Finally, we should re-evaluate what constitutes evidence of consciousness. Look for agency, self-organization, and complex electromagnetic patterns in nature, not just in beings with brains.
This episode invites listeners to expand their perception of consciousness and the cosmos.
Episode Overview
- The episode explores the historical and cross-cultural belief that the sun, stars, and planets are conscious beings, often regarded as gods or goddesses.
- It contrasts this ancient, near-universal perspective with the modern, materialist view that emerged during the 17th-century scientific revolution, which declared the cosmos inanimate and machine-like.
- The speaker argues that the philosophical concept of panpsychism is re-opening the possibility of cosmic consciousness, challenging the long-held assumption that consciousness is exclusive to beings with brains.
- The discussion suggests that celestial bodies like the sun meet several criteria for consciousness, including agency, self-organization, and complex electromagnetic patterns.
Key Concepts
- Traditional Animism: In most traditional cultures (e.g., Japanese, Latin, Indian), it was taken for granted that celestial bodies like the sun were conscious entities, such as gods or goddesses.
- Medieval Philosophy: Thinkers like Thomas Aquinas and Plato viewed planets and stars as conscious beings with "angelic intelligences" or as "visible gods."
- The Scientific Revolution: The 17th century marked a significant shift where the universe was re-conceptualized as an inanimate, unconscious, mechanical system, making the idea of a conscious sun seem absurd.
- Materialist Worldview: The dominant modern scientific view that consciousness is a product of brains, making it impossible for non-biological entities like stars to be conscious.
- Panpsychism: A philosophical theory suggesting that consciousness is a fundamental and ubiquitous feature of reality. This framework liberates the imagination to consider consciousness in entities without brains, from electrons to stars.
- Criteria for Consciousness: The speaker posits that entities like the sun exhibit qualities that could be considered criteria for consciousness, such as agency, self-organization, and complex electromagnetic patterns that could serve as an interface for thought.
Quotes
- At 00:00 - "In traditional cultures, it's taken for granted that the sun is conscious. It's a god or a goddess." - The speaker introduces the historical and cross-cultural baseline for viewing celestial bodies as conscious.
- At 01:05 - "And so, in that context, asking if the sun's conscious seems absurd for a materialist. It's just a stupid question." - Explaining how the shift in worldview during the scientific revolution made the ancient belief seem irrational and primitive.
- At 02:05 - "And what panpsychism does is liberates our imagination because it says that consciousness doesn't have to be located only in brains." - The speaker highlights how panpsychism provides a modern philosophical framework to reconsider the possibility of consciousness in non-biological systems.
Takeaways
- Question the assumption that the materialist worldview is the only valid one; it is a relatively recent and culturally specific perspective, not a universal truth.
- Consider panpsychism as a lens to broaden your understanding of consciousness beyond the confines of biology and neuroscience.
- Re-evaluate what constitutes evidence of consciousness by looking for complex, self-organizing systems and agency in nature, not just in beings with brains.