Why Joe Biden Is The #1 Worst President In US History | Marko Papic

J
Jacob Shapiro Dec 05, 2025

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode presents a controversial ranking of US presidents' foreign policy, critically examining Joe Biden's administration. The conversation highlights three key takeaways. First, context is critical when evaluating foreign policy, especially adapting from a unipolar to a multipolar world. Second, domestic political perception often overrides pragmatic foreign policy decisions. Third, defining clear objectives is essential for successful foreign intervention. A core argument asserts the Biden administration made critical errors by operating with a unipolar mindset in a multipolar world. This failure to adapt to new geopolitical realities undermines effective strategy. Domestic political pressures, particularly the fear of appearing 'soft on China,' have paralyzed the administration, hindering pragmatic negotiations. This pursuit of political optics over practical outcomes can lead to worse foreign policy results. Regarding Ukraine, the critique suggests the administration's primary failure was not clearly defining what 'victory' looks like. Without clear objectives, military and financial support risks becoming an open-ended, costly quagmire. Ultimately, the analysis attributes flawed foreign policy to susceptibility to domestic and social media pressures.

Episode Overview

  • One speaker presents his list of the five worst US presidents for foreign policy, controversially placing Joe Biden at number one.
  • The list also includes George W. Bush, Lyndon B. Johnson, Dwight D. Eisenhower, and John F. Kennedy.
  • A significant portion of the episode is a debate between the two hosts about the merits and failures of Joe Biden's foreign policy, particularly concerning the war in Ukraine and the withdrawal from Afghanistan.
  • The discussion explores how domestic political pressures and a failure to adapt to a multipolar world have shaped recent US foreign policy decisions.

Key Concepts

  • Ranking Presidential Foreign Policy: The central exercise of the episode is a subjective ranking of presidents based on their perceived foreign policy blunders, with a strong emphasis on post-WWII administrations.
  • Critique of Biden's Ukraine Strategy: The speaker argues that the Biden administration's primary failure in Ukraine was not clearly defining what "victory" looks like, leading to a prolonged and costly conflict without a clear endgame.
  • Neoconservatism in the Modern Era: Joe Biden's foreign policy is characterized as "the last gasp of neoconservatism," suggesting he revived a failed, interventionist approach from the George W. Bush era instead of adapting to new geopolitical realities.
  • The "Soft on China" Dilemma: The discussion highlights how domestic political fear of being perceived as "soft on China" has paralyzed the Biden administration, preventing it from pursuing pragmatic negotiations or de-escalation.
  • Unipolar vs. Multipolar World: A core argument is that Joe Biden's administration has made critical errors by acting as if the US still operates in a unipolar world, failing to recognize the constraints and dynamics of a new multipolar era.

Quotes

  • At 00:11 - "I would say the worst president in the history of the United States of America for foreign policy." - The speaker makes his controversial initial claim, placing Joe Biden at the top of his "worst presidents" list.
  • At 01:37 - "He was the one who ended the forever wars... it was Biden who took the flack to do it." - The second speaker offers a counterpoint, giving President Biden credit for making the difficult decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan.
  • At 08:49 - "They live in a social media age, they live in an age where foreign policy has never been as democratically discussed domestically... and they were so susceptible to those pressures." - The first speaker provides his final analysis on why the Biden administration's foreign policy is flawed, attributing it to a weakness against domestic political and social media pressures.

Takeaways

  • Context is critical when evaluating foreign policy. A president's decisions must be judged against the geopolitical realities of their time; applying a unipolar mindset (like in the 1990s) to a multipolar world is a recipe for failure.
  • Domestic political perception can override pragmatic foreign policy. The fear of appearing weak to adversaries can prevent an administration from making necessary diplomatic deals or de-escalating conflicts, leading to worse outcomes.
  • Clearly defining objectives is essential for successful foreign intervention. Without a clear and achievable definition of "victory" or a desired end-state, military and financial support for allies can become an open-ended quagmire with no clear path to resolution.