Trend Following Is Becoming Something Bigger Than Crisis Alpha | Systematic Investor | Ep.413

T
Top Traders Unplugged Aug 17, 2026

Audio Brief

Show transcript
In this conversation, industry experts explore how systematic investing and trend-following strategies can navigate a bifurcated macro environment while providing critical diversification for modern portfolios. There are three key takeaways to understand about this evolving landscape. First, active systematic strategies are far superior to simple buy-and-hold commodity exposure. Second, structural dispersion among managers requires a diversified multi-manager approach rather than relying on a single commodity trading advisor. Finally, institutional investors are increasingly leveraging capital-efficient vehicle structures to execute these rules-based models. Traditional buy-and-hold commodity strategies often expose investors to massive historical drawdowns of up to eighty percent due to severe roll costs along the futures curve. Active systematic models mitigate this risk by blending trend, carry, and curve-structure signals. This approach generates positive yields and provides downside protection, converting volatile raw assets into stable performance contributors. While trend following is often marketed as a uniform concept, performance dispersion between individual managers remains exceptionally high. Relying on a single manager introduces significant idiosyncratic risk due to differences in execution, portfolio construction, and risk-management protocols. Utilizing a diversified basket of trend-followers smooths out these differences and provides more reliable, long-term diversification. The industry has undergone a major structural shift from restrictive offshore funds to highly liquid, capital-efficient structures like Separately Managed Accounts and exchange-traded funds. By utilizing listed futures, these modern formats allow institutional allocators to run overlay strategies with minimal upfront capital. This structure enables investors to maintain full equity exposure while simultaneously capturing non-correlated alpha. As macroeconomic uncertainty persists, systematic rules-based strategies offer a highly disciplined mechanism to exploit market inefficiencies and protect capital.

Episode Overview

  • Understanding Systematic Investing: This episode explores the mechanics, evolution, and role of systematic trading strategies—particularly Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) and trend followers—within a modern asset allocation framework.
  • The Bifurcated Macro Environment: The discussion highlights the stark contrast between growth-heavy, FOMO-driven equity markets and cautious, inflation-sensitive macro environments, explaining how systematic models navigate these conflicting narratives.
  • Debunking Industry Marketing and Biases: The conversation dismantles common misconceptions around "crisis alpha" marketing, the illusion of "plain vanilla" trend following, and the performance illusions caused by selection bias in index reporting.
  • Strategic Evolution and Vehicle Structures: The narrative tracks the structural shift of CTA products from restrictive offshore structures to highly accessible mutual funds, UCITS, and capital-efficient Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs).

Key Concepts

  • Market Resilience and Diversification: CTAs maintain performance consistency by extracting gains from a highly diversified pool of global asset classes (energy, precious metals, equities) rather than relying on a single, dominant market trend.
  • The Danger of Unintended Correlation in Carry Trades: Combining non-trend "carry" strategies with trend following can lead to crowded positioning (e.g., shorting the Yen). When abrupt market reversals or interventions occur, these highly correlated exposures can result in severe, concurrent losses.
  • Product Evolution and Fee Compression: Stricter regulatory boundaries historically caused liquid alternatives like UCITS to underperform Cayman-based structures. Modernized product designs and reduced operational friction have effectively closed this gap, bringing institutional-grade execution to retail-accessible formats.
  • Commodity Enhanced Beta: To combat the heavy roll costs of simple buy-and-hold commodity strategies, active products blend trend, carry, and curve-structure signals to generate positive yields from the futures curve while mitigating massive drawdown risks.
  • The Core Value of Rules-Based Risk Management: The long-term survivability of a systematic strategy relies heavily on trade sizing, leverage management, and systematic stop-losses rather than the exact parameter of its entry signals.
  • Bifurcated Industry Taxonomy (Trend vs. Non-Trend): The systematic investing landscape is splitting into highly scale-constrained, multi-billion-dollar "blue-chip" trend-following giants and highly specialized "non-trend" players focusing on short-term trading, quantitative macro, and niche commodity curves.
  • Portable Alpha and Managed Accounts: Using listed futures contracts allows institutional allocators to run overlay strategies (such as CTAs) with minimal capital. This capital efficiency enables investors to maintain full equity exposure while using their margin to capture non-correlated alpha.
  • The Illusion of "Plain Vanilla" Trend Following: Although the basic premise of following trends is widely understood, treating it as a commodity overlooks the severe dispersion in performance caused by differences in execution, portfolio construction, and risk-management protocols.
  • "Sneaky Selection Bias" and Index Back-Filling: Historical indexes often present an overly optimistic picture of average manager returns. This is because they back-fill the performance of current top-performing managers, masking the historical drag of funds that underperformed, shrank, or closed down.

Quotes

  • At 0:02:24 - "It's like the markets have almost forgotten about volatility... I feel like we're in a new normal where prices have now digested the volatility." - Tom Wrobel on how markets have adapted to ongoing geopolitical tensions and price fluctuations.
  • At 0:03:34 - "I don't know how you can conduct any kind of normal traditional valuation analysis in this world right now." - Andrew Beer reflecting on the difficulty of applying fundamental valuation metrics to speculative, growth-heavy equity markets.
  • At 0:08:04 - "The important thing to realize about these gains is they've come from a variety of places. It hasn't just been one trend." - Tom Wrobel highlighting how CTAs benefit from broad asset diversification rather than a single market move.
  • At 0:10:04 - "Being long equities post-liberation day was actually quite contrarian relative to what fundamental investors were saying at the time." - Andrew Beer explaining the value of systematic trend-following as a tactical, contrarian alpha generator.
  • At 0:15:39 - "Flat has been the new up... stability has been so valuable over the past four or five months." - Andrew Beer on why capital preservation and low volatility have been major wins for systematic portfolios during choppy periods.
  • At 0:21:44 - "Whenever we do an in-depth correlation analysis like that... we actually tend to roll data up into weekly periods just to avoid timezone differentials and settlement issues." - Tom Wrobel explaining a practical methodology used by analysts to clean up "noisy" daily data when comparing assets across global markets.
  • At 0:22:25 - "These funds take long-flat or long-short positions, are systematic, and can use momentum and term structure strategies." - Tom Wrobel explaining the mechanics of "third-generation" commodity funds trying to improve on simple buy-and-hold approaches.
  • At 0:23:05 - "The drawdown of commodities over the past 25 years is 80%... That's why there's this expression in commodities: 'you take the escalator up and the elevator down.'" - Tom Wrobel highlighting the extreme risk and volatility associated with raw commodity exposure compared to systematic managed futures.
  • At 0:24:14 - "CTAs have an inherent leverage from futures margin... but these are groups that are experts in this field... trying to hedge risk." - Tom Wrobel clarifying that while "leverage" sounds risky, CTAs use it structurally to manage risk efficiently across diverse markets.
  • At 0:25:38 - "Trend is becoming plain vanilla... but non-trend is really a lot less uniform. There isn't any definition of what non-trend is, it's just not trend-following." - Tom Wrobel explaining the industry’s new taxonomy and how anything outside of traditional trend following is classified as a bespoke, niche strategy.
  • At 0:26:45 - "We don't need a lot of versions of what we do... but on the other hand, if we can create different vehicles that help people because someone is price-sensitive... that helps expand the pool of investors." - Andrew Beer emphasizing that vehicle structure (ETFs vs. Mutual Funds vs. SMAs) is often more important for investor adoption than endless product customization.
  • At 0:48:01 - "I think there's a lot more that goes into being a trend follower than plain vanilla... there is a risk that people will get to the point where they say, 'Well, trend is all the same, I just need one.'" - Niels Kaastrup-Larsen explaining why commoditizing trend-following strategies can lead to poor diversification and underestimating manager-specific risks.
  • At 0:50:41 - "The best opportunities are because somebody has handcuffs from an investment perspective... even though they're smart, they somehow are not able to capitalize on it." - Andrew Beer illustrating why systematic, rules-based CTAs can exploit market inefficiencies that human-managed, emotional, or structurally constrained funds cannot.

Takeaways

  • Ditch simple buy-and-hold commodity exposure: To avoid devastating drawdown cycles of up to 80%, access commodities via active, trend, or carry strategies that harvest yields from futures curve structures.
  • Implement a multi-manager approach to mitigate single-manager risk: Do not rely on a single CTA; the performance dispersion between managers is incredibly high, making a diversified basket of trend-followers a safer approach.
  • Exploit structural constraints using systematic models: Build or allocate to rules-based models that take advantage of human-managed or highly constrained institutional funds that are structurally forbidden from quickly cutting losses or pivoting.
  • Adopt Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs) for capital efficiency: Transition from traditional commingled funds to SMAs to gain structural advantages such as cross-margining, direct oversight, and customized risk profiles.
  • Utilize trend following as a "completion strategy": Instead of viewing CTAs as a speculative, standalone tool, utilize them to plug diversification gaps in traditional 60/40 portfolios across varying macroeconomic cycles.
  • Account for index survivorship bias during due diligence: When analyzing historical fund data, discount the historical "back-filled" returns of top performers and evaluate how the index actually performed in real-time.
  • Balance long-term compounding with short-term protection: Understand that adding short-term trading strategies to smooth out volatile drawdowns is a trade-off that typically reduces the long-term, compounding returns of pure trend following.