Tom Lee on How the Stock Market Could Quadruple | The Compound & Friends #26

The Compound The Compound Dec 16, 2021

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode covers Fundstrat's Tom Lee presenting a long-term bullish case for the U.S. stock market, identifying powerful structural forces for continued gains. There are three key takeaways from this discussion. First, common market indicators, such as high household equity allocation, may not signal an imminent top, especially if they result from passive appreciation rather than active speculation. Second, long-term demographic shifts, with the Millennial generation entering its prime earning and innovating years, represent a significant tailwind for equities. Third, a persistent environment of negative real interest rates historically pushes capital into stocks, fueling strong market performance. Tom Lee notes the surprising resilience and breadth of the 2021 market rally, despite concerns about record-high household equity allocation. He emphasizes the U.S. possesses abundant internal "saver capital" to fund innovation and growth without relying heavily on external economies. A strong historical correlation exists between the number of adults aged 30 to 48 and long-term stock market returns. This demographic shift, driven by the Millennial generation, provides a powerful and sustained upward force for stocks over the next decade. Historical data consistently shows that periods of negative real interest rates, where inflation outpaces bond yields, lead to "parabolic" gains in the stock market. This environment makes holding cash and bonds detrimental to wealth, redirecting capital into equities. Lee also offers a contrarian view that a large portion of corporate buybacks is re-issued as employee stock-based compensation. In summary, investors should consider structural forces like demographics and negative real rates, re-evaluating traditional market signals for a forward-looking perspective.

Episode Overview

  • Tom Lee of Fundstrat presents a long-term bullish case for the U.S. stock market, arguing that powerful structural forces are in place to support continued gains.
  • The discussion reviews the surprising resilience and breadth of the 2021 market rally, including the collapse of high-flying growth stocks and record-high household equity allocation.
  • Lee identifies two primary tailwinds for the next decade: favorable demographics with Millennials entering their prime innovation years and a persistent environment of negative real interest rates.
  • Based on these factors, Lee makes a bold prediction that the S&P 500 could reach 19,000 by the end of the decade, while also offering contrarian views on corporate buybacks and market indicators.

Key Concepts

  • 2021 Market Surprises: The discussion covered the surprising resilience of the stock market, the broad-based nature of the S&P 500's 26% gain, the rapid downfall of ARK Innovation stocks, and record-high household equity allocation.
  • Volatility as a Predictor: Tom Lee's bullish 2021 thesis was based on the expectation that market volatility would collapse, which has historically led to strong average market gains of around 25%.
  • U.S. as a Self-Sufficient Capital Supplier: A core thesis is that with over $140 trillion in household net worth, the U.S. has enough internal "saver capital" to fund innovation and growth without relying on external economies.
  • Long-Term Demographic Tailwind: A strong historical correlation exists between the number of adults in their prime working and innovating years (ages 30-48) and long-term stock market returns, a trend that is currently favorable with the Millennial generation.
  • Negative Real Interest Rates: Historical data shows that periods of negative real interest rates, where inflation is higher than bond yields, have consistently led to "parabolic" gains in the stock market.
  • Corporate Buybacks & Employee Compensation: A contrarian view that a large portion (potentially 80%) of corporate buyback proceeds are not used to reduce share count but are re-issued to employees as stock-based compensation.

Quotes

  • At 3:24 - "The biggest reason is that we expected volatility to collapse... and when vol drops, you had a 25% average gain." - Tom Lee explaining the core thesis behind his bullish 2021 market forecast.
  • At 6:44 - "Households don't necessarily make a conscious asset allocation decision. So equities can become a large percentage because they never sell and they've gone up a lot." - Tom Lee providing context for why high household equity allocation may not be a bearish signal.
  • At 18:16 - "Because now there's so much saver capital, you don't need an economy." - Tom Lee explaining his provocative idea that immense accumulated U.S. wealth has created a self-sustaining system for returns.
  • At 23:02 - "So if this plays out, S&P's 19,000." - Tom Lee making a bold, long-term prediction for the S&P 500 based on favorable demographic trends.
  • At 32:18 - "You know, I don't think these are accurate charts either... because I think 80% of the proceeds of buybacks is then issued to employees." - Tom Lee presenting a contrarian take on the purpose of corporate buybacks.
  • At 41:05 - "The stock market has always gone parabolic." - Tom Lee describing the historical pattern of stock market performance during sustained periods of negative real interest rates.

Takeaways

  • Re-evaluate common market indicators; high household equity allocation may not signal an imminent top if it's a passive result of market appreciation rather than active speculation.
  • Consider long-term, slow-moving forces like demographics, as the entry of the Millennial generation into its prime earning years could be a powerful tailwind for stocks over the next decade.
  • Recognize that in a negative real interest rate environment, holding cash and bonds can be detrimental to wealth, which has historically pushed capital into equities and fueled strong market performance.
  • Look beyond the surface-level narrative of corporate actions; share buybacks, for example, may primarily serve to fund employee stock compensation rather than simply engineering a higher EPS.