There are skeletons in the liberal university's closet | Tommy J Curry

T
The Institute of Art and Ideas Jan 03, 2026

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode analyzes the historical foundations of liberalism and intersectionality, challenging mainstream narratives of the Civil Rights era. There are three key takeaways from this discussion. First, the inclusion of 'sex' in the 1964 Civil Rights Act's Title VII is argued to be a strategic move. Second, the mainstream narrative of a purely non-violent Civil Rights movement is challenged. Third, academic liberalism worked to neutralize radical Black thought post-Civil Rights. The addition of 'sex' to Title VII allegedly aimed to divest Black Americans of economic opportunities, redirecting them toward white women. This move is presented as hijacking gains from the Black freedom struggle rather than expanding civil rights universally. The historical account emphasizes that armed Black self-defense and militancy were crucial. These elements protected non-violent protestors and secured progress against white terrorism, refuting sanitized historical portrayals. Following the Civil Rights era, institutions like Harvard re-centered education on Western principles to maintain the status quo. This process worked to demonize Black militancy and contain radical political thought. This discussion encourages a critical re-examination of historical origins for political terms and social movements.

Episode Overview

  • This episode presents a provocative historical analysis of liberalism and intersectionality, arguing they have "dirty" and often-ignored foundations.
  • Philosopher Tommy Curry contends that the addition of "sex" to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) was a strategic move to divest Black Americans of economic opportunities and redirect them toward white women.
  • The talk challenges the mainstream narrative of a peaceful Civil Rights movement, highlighting the crucial role of armed Black self-defense and militancy in achieving progress.
  • Curry argues that following the Civil Rights era, academic liberalism worked to neutralize radical Black thought and re-center education on Western principles to maintain the status quo.

Key Concepts

  • Critique of Liberalism: Liberalism is framed not just as a political philosophy but as a dominant moral norm that equates rationality with its own tenets, thereby pathologizing and dismissing radical resistance as irrational.
  • The Civil Rights Act (Title VII): The speaker argues that the inclusion of "sex" as a protected class was initially a "poison pill" meant to kill the bill. When it passed, it created a system that privileged the claims of white women over Black Americans, effectively hijacking the gains of the Black freedom struggle.
  • Black Power vs. Liberal Coalitions: The Black Power movement was fundamentally opposed to forming "asymmetrical coalitions" with liberal white groups, arguing that the interests of the politically and economically secure group would always supersede those of the marginalized group.
  • The Role of Armed Self-Defense: The lecture refutes the sanitized narrative of a purely non-violent Civil Rights movement. It emphasizes that armed self-defense and Black militancy were key to protecting non-violent protestors and securing the era's gains against white terrorism.
  • Academic Neutralization of Radicalism: In the aftermath of the Civil Rights and anti-war movements, institutions like Harvard implemented core curricula designed to demonize Black militancy and recenter education on "universal humanist principles of Western civilization," thus containing radical political thought.

Quotes

  • At 00:04 - "The addition of sex to Title VII was not only meant to destroy the bill, but to fundamentally divest Black people who had fought for civil rights in the United States of any economic or educational opportunities and give them to white women." - Speaker Tommy Curry outlines his central thesis about the true purpose and effect of including sex in the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
  • At 03:36 - "An educated person would be someone who could not only think clearly and effectively, but someone who believed in the universal humanist principles of Western civilization." - Curry quotes from a Harvard Core Curriculum report to illustrate how academia worked to neutralize radical Black thought by redefining what it meant to be "educated."
  • At 09:46 - "The white women of this country would be drastically discriminated against in favor of a Negro woman." - Quoting from the 1964 Congressional Record, Curry reveals the explicit racial logic used by lawmakers to justify prioritizing white women's employment rights over those of Black women and men.

Takeaways

  • Critically examine the historical origins of political terms and legislation, as their intended purpose can be vastly different from their celebrated legacy.
  • Recognize that historical narratives of social movements are often simplified and sanitized; understanding the more radical and confrontational elements is crucial for a complete picture.
  • Be cautious of forming political coalitions where there is a significant power imbalance, as the interests of the more privileged group may inadvertently or intentionally undermine the goals of the marginalized group.