The Whole Market Looks Expensive — Is it Time to De-Risk? | Prof G Markets

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode examines growing bearish sentiment in US markets, the geopolitical AI race, and the politicization of US economic policy. Three key takeaways emerge. First, experts advise diversifying investment portfolios beyond US equities into emerging markets due to anticipated underperformance. Second, China holds a significant competitive advantage in the AI race, largely due to its superior and cheaper energy production. Third, the politicization of crucial US economic policies, especially in renewable energy and housing, hinders practical solutions and long-term stability. A growing consensus among financial experts suggests a potential decade of underperformance for US equities. This perspective, shared by figures like Aswath Damodaran, urges investors to de-risk portfolios. International diversification, particularly into emerging markets, is seen as a vital hedge against future downturns. The US-China AI competition is a central geopolitical concern. China’s ability to produce vast amounts of low-cost, government-subsidized energy provides a critical advantage. Energy-intensive AI model training and operation become significantly cheaper, fueling China's lead in this technological frontier. The politicization of essential US economic policies, particularly in renewable energy and housing, impedes progress. Labeling crucial investments as "woke" ignores their practical economic benefits and stalls solutions. For the housing crisis, only a massive increase in supply through new construction offers a viable path forward, dismissing complex financial engineering. Underlying many of these issues is a systemic intergenerational transfer of wealth from younger to older demographics, demanding reevaluation of long-term economic strategy.

Episode Overview

  • The episode explores the increasingly bearish sentiment in the U.S. stock market, with experts advising diversification into emerging markets as a hedge against a decade of potential underperformance.
  • A central theme is the geopolitical AI race between the U.S. and China, with a focus on how China's superior and cheaper energy production gives it a significant competitive advantage in developing AI models.
  • The hosts critique the politicization of U.S. economic policy, arguing that labeling crucial investments in areas like renewable energy and housing as "woke" hinders practical, common-sense solutions.
  • The discussion delves into the U.S. housing crisis, dismissing financial engineering like 50-year mortgages and advocating for a massive increase in housing supply as the only viable solution.
  • The conversation repeatedly returns to the core thesis that many of America's pressing economic issues stem from a systemic intergenerational transfer of wealth from the young to the old.

Key Concepts

  • Market Bearishness and De-risking: A growing consensus among financial experts, including Aswath Damodaran and Goldman Sachs, suggests a period of underperformance for U.S. equities, leading to recommendations to diversify internationally and de-risk portfolios.
  • The US-China AI Race: The development of AI is framed as a critical geopolitical competition where China is gaining a major advantage due to its ability to produce vast amounts of low-cost, government-subsidized energy, which is essential for training and running AI models.
  • Politicization of Economic Policy: The hosts express frustration that essential infrastructure and economic policies, particularly renewable energy, are being stalled in the U.S. because they have been framed as part of a "woke" cultural agenda, ignoring their economic benefits.
  • Housing Crisis Solutions: The conversation contrasts ineffective "financial engineering" proposals like the 50-year mortgage with the fundamental need to solve the housing affordability crisis by massively increasing supply through new construction.
  • Intergenerational Wealth Transfer: A core argument is that the root cause of many of America's economic and social challenges is the decades-long transfer of wealth from younger generations to older, wealthier demographics.
  • Journalism and Access: The discussion touches on the ethical complexities of journalism, where reporters sometimes build relationships with controversial or compromised individuals to gain access and report on important stories.

Quotes

  • At 0:28 - "I think the key to being offensive is it has to be funnier than it is offensive, and I don't think I got there with this one." - Scott Galloway self-critiques his opening joke, admitting it likely failed to meet his own standard for humor.
  • At 4:09 - "Last week we spoke with Professor Aswath Damodaran and he said something quite striking... he said there is, quote, 'no place to hide' in the stock market." - Ed Elson introduces the episode's central theme by quoting valuation expert Aswath Damodaran's recent bearish sentiment.
  • At 27:59 - "The idea of you having real insight into what the fuck is going on in the shitshow funhouse of horrors in my head is so frightening to me." - Scott Galloway humorously pushes back on the idea that anyone can understand his thought process.
  • At 29:38 - "I still think that there is a ton of value in AI, and I think there are plenty of tech companies that are not that overvalued." - Ed Elson expresses a more bullish view on the tech market, despite concerns about a bubble.
  • At 41:36 - "My biggest prediction for 2026 is that the AI trade unwinds in the U.S. at the hands of government-sponsored subsidization of Chinese AI." - Scott Galloway predicts that China's state support will give it a decisive advantage in the AI race.
  • At 43:12 - "Why is it so much cheaper to create AI in China? It's because China produces way more energy than America." - Ed Elson connects China's low-cost AI models directly to its superior energy production capacity.
  • At 44:04 - "Why are we not investing in energy, specifically renewable energy? Because we've decided that it's 'woke.' That's the only reason." - Ed Elson criticizes the politicization of U.S. energy policy.
  • At 47:04 - "Texas, which is not known as a progressive… they have more wind power, they're the largest producer of wind power in the nation because the economics work." - Scott Galloway uses Texas as an example of how practical economics can override political ideology.
  • At 59:23 - "It shouldn't be 'drill, baby, drill,' it should be 'build, baby, build.'" - Scott Galloway argues that the solution to the housing crisis is a massive increase in construction, not more financial gimmicks.
  • At 1:01:45 - "You want to solve all this shit? Simple. Take money out of the pockets of wealthy senior people who keep voting themselves more fucking money and transfer it into the pockets of people under the age of 40. Full stop." - Scott Galloway offers his blunt, overarching solution to many of the economic and social problems facing America.
  • At 1:07:11 - "With all the Epstein files coming out, a nuclear weapon of distraction." - Scott Galloway makes a provocative prediction about how the Trump administration might handle politically damaging revelations.

Takeaways

  • To hedge against potential market downturns, consider diversifying your investment portfolio beyond U.S. equities and tilting toward emerging markets.
  • Recognize that a nation's energy infrastructure and policy are now direct drivers of its technological competitiveness, especially in the energy-intensive field of AI.
  • Evaluate economic and infrastructure policies based on their practical merits and financial viability, rather than allowing them to be derailed by political or cultural labels.
  • Advocate for policies that dramatically increase housing supply, as this is the most fundamental and effective solution to the ongoing affordability crisis.
  • Understand that many economic pressures on younger generations are the result of long-term policy choices that have favored older demographics, and systemic changes are needed to rebalance the economy.
  • When consuming news, be aware of the complex relationships journalists may cultivate with sources and critically evaluate the information presented.