The universe doesn't have a beginning or an end | Roger Penrose, Claudia de Rham, Karen Crowther
Audio Brief
Show transcript
This episode explores Nobel Laureate Roger Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, which posits an ageless universe where the Big Bang was a transition, not an origin, along with challenges to the standard cosmological model.
There are three key takeaways from this discussion. First, foundational scientific assumptions, like the Big Bang being the absolute beginning, are models subject to re-evaluation. Second, scientific measurements, including the universe's age, are model-dependent and can change with evolving cosmological frameworks. Third, cosmological crises, such as conflicting expansion rate measurements, represent significant opportunities for discovering new physics and deeper understanding.
Nobel Laureate Roger Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology challenges the notion of the Big Bang as an absolute beginning. He proposes the universe cycles through infinite eons, with the Big Bang merely a transition from a previous phase. This theory suggests the very concept of the universe's age may be a construct tied to our current, potentially incomplete, models. Astronomical observations of structures like the "Giant Arc" also challenge the standard Big Bang model, appearing too large to have formed within the universe's conventional age.
Current measurements for the universe's age and expansion rate are derived from the standard cosmological model. Discrepancies, like the Hubble Tension, highlight potential incompleteness in this model. If the underlying framework is flawed, then calculations derived from it, including the universe's supposed age, are also subject to revision. Penrose suggests that mass gives the universe a "ticking clock" and scale, and without it in the far future, a transition to a new eon becomes mathematically possible.
The "crisis in cosmology" refers to the Hubble Tension, where different methods for measuring the universe's expansion rate yield conflicting results. This significant discrepancy suggests our standard cosmological model requires fundamental revisions or new physics. Far from a failure, such scientific impasses often pave the way for revolutionary breakthroughs and a deeper understanding of cosmic reality.
This discussion highlights that our understanding of cosmic origins and the universe's fundamental nature remains an evolving frontier, continually reshaped by new theories and challenging observations.
Episode Overview
- Nobel Laureate Roger Penrose presents his theory of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC), arguing that the universe is ageless and the Big Bang was not the beginning, but a transition from a previous cosmic "eon."
- The panel discusses how recent astronomical discoveries, such as giant rings of galaxies that appear older than the universe, challenge the standard cosmological model.
- The debate explores the philosophical and scientific definitions of time and age, questioning whether the concept of the "age of the universe" is a human construct tied to our current models or an absolute fact.
- Physicist Claudia de Rham addresses the "crisis in cosmology," where different measurement methods for the universe's expansion yield conflicting results, suggesting our standard model may be incomplete.
Key Concepts
- Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC): Roger Penrose's model where the universe goes through infinite cycles (eons). The incredibly expanded, cold, and empty remote future of one eon becomes mathematically equivalent to the hot, dense Big Bang of the next.
- The Big Bang as a Transition, Not a Beginning: A core idea of CCC is that the Big Bang wasn't the origin of everything, but simply the start of our current eon. Events from the previous eon could have left an imprint on ours.
- Anomalous Astronomical Observations: The discovery of large-scale structures like the "Giant Arc" and "Big Ring"—collections of galaxies that are too large to have formed in the time since the Big Bang, according to conventional cosmology. Penrose argues these are evidence for events from a previous eon.
- The Role of Mass in Time: Penrose posits that mass is what gives the universe a "ticking clock" and a sense of scale. In the remote future, as mass effectively disappears, the concept of scale (both time and space) is lost, allowing the universe to transition into a new, compact state.
- The Hubble Tension (Crisis in Cosmology): The disagreement between measurements of the universe's expansion rate (the Hubble constant) derived from the early universe (Cosmic Microwave Background) and the late universe (supernovae). This discrepancy suggests that our current cosmological model is incomplete.
Quotes
- At 00:09 - "the Big Bang was not the beginning." - Roger Penrose makes his central claim that the age of the universe is not the time since the Big Bang, because the Big Bang was merely a transitional event from a previous cosmic phase.
- At 05:27 - "I'm not sure it makes sense to ask about the age of the universe." - Philosopher Karen Crowther questions the premise itself, suggesting that while we can date objects within the universe, the concept of a definitive age may not apply to the universe as a whole, which may be ageless.
- At 16:34 - "The mass is a ticking clock... However, it's the presence of mass which determines the scale." - Roger Penrose explains the mechanism behind his theory, arguing that mass creates the scale for both time and space. When mass effectively vanishes in the distant future, the universe loses its scale, allowing it to transition into the next Big Bang.
Takeaways
- Question foundational scientific assumptions. The widely accepted idea of the Big Bang as the absolute beginning of time is a model, not an unchallengeable fact, and can be re-evaluated in light of new theories and evidence.
- Recognize that scientific measurements are model-dependent. The "age of the universe" is a calculation based on our current cosmological model. If the model is wrong or incomplete, as discrepancies suggest, then the calculation is also subject to change.
- View scientific crises as opportunities. Disagreements in cosmological data, like the Hubble Tension, are not failures but exciting puzzles that may point the way toward revolutionary new physics and a deeper understanding of reality.