The Private Credit Panic: Why Wall Street’s Big Winners are Now Losing | Real Eisman Playbook Ep 33
Audio Brief
Show transcript
This episode explores the puzzling underperformance of major alternative asset managers, analyzes strategic challenges at leading banks, and discusses the fundamental disruption of active asset management.
There are four key takeaways from this discussion. First, market performance can diverge sharply from official commentary, signaling deeper investor concerns not publicly acknowledged. Second, admitting strategic failure and pivoting to core competencies is crucial for long-term success. Third, avoiding massive concentrated bets on macroeconomic factors is vital, as miscalculations can severely impair large institutions. Finally, bold leadership challenging long-standing tradition is often required to simplify and refocus a complex business for future growth amid industry disruption.
The stocks of major private credit and private equity firms have performed poorly despite strong fundraising, optimistic economic commentary, and a bull market. This paradox signals investor skepticism and demands a clear articulation of strategic value beyond market beta. Firms must demonstrate unique alpha to justify valuations.
Goldman Sachs, after abandoning its consumer banking venture, is refocusing on investment banking and growing asset and wealth management, mirroring Morgan Stanley's successful transformation. Citigroup is undertaking a gutsy overhaul, exiting numerous international consumer markets to simplify its core operations. These pivots highlight the need for agility and a willingness to shed non-performing assets.
Bank of America’s stock underperformed due to massive unrealized losses on its balance sheet. This stemmed from a large bet on long-duration, low-yield securities before interest rates rose significantly. This illustrates the danger of concentrated macroeconomic wagers. Jane Fraser’s bold restructuring at Citigroup, defying decades of company tradition, exemplifies necessary leadership to streamline complex businesses.
The rise of low-cost index funds and ETFs has fundamentally disrupted traditional active asset management. These passive vehicles commoditize market returns, or beta, putting immense pressure on active managers who can no longer charge high fees for undifferentiated performance. Firms must now focus on providing truly unique, high-value services that cannot be easily replicated by passive alternatives.
These insights underscore the critical need for strategic clarity, adaptability, and bold leadership in an evolving financial landscape.
Episode Overview
- The podcast explores the puzzling underperformance of major alternative asset managers like Blackstone and Apollo, whose stocks have fallen despite a strong market and positive economic commentary from banks.
- It analyzes the strategic challenges and pivots at major banks, including Goldman Sachs' retreat from consumer banking, Bank of America's balance sheet issues from a major interest rate bet, and Citigroup's bold restructuring.
- The discussion contrasts the successful transformation of Morgan Stanley into a wealth and asset management powerhouse with the current efforts by other firms to emulate its model.
- It covers the fundamental disruption of the traditional active asset management industry by low-cost passive investment vehicles like ETFs, which have commoditized market returns.
Key Concepts
- Alternative Asset Manager Paradox: Despite a bull market, strong fundraising, and optimistic public statements, the stocks of major private credit and private equity firms have performed poorly.
- Goldman Sachs' Strategic Pivot: After abandoning its unsuccessful consumer banking venture, Goldman is refocusing on its core strengths in investment banking while aiming to grow its asset and wealth management divisions, following a model successfully executed by Morgan Stanley.
- Bank of America's Interest Rate Bet: The bank's stock has underperformed due to massive unrealized losses on its balance sheet, stemming from a large investment in long-duration, low-yield securities before interest rates rose significantly.
- Citigroup's Restructuring: CEO Jane Fraser is undertaking a major overhaul by exiting numerous international consumer markets to simplify the bank and focus on core operations, a gutsy break from decades of company tradition.
- The "Superpower" of Private Credit: Firms like Apollo utilize stable, long-duration liabilities (unlike a bank's overnight deposits) as a foundational advantage for their lending operations.
- Disruption by Passive Investing: The rise of low-cost index funds and ETFs has commoditized market returns ("beta"), putting massive pressure on traditional active managers who can no longer charge high fees for undifferentiated performance.
Quotes
- At 0:12 - "Secular growth stories in a market reaching all-time highs and they keep raising new money. And the stocks are down." - Glenn Schorr summarizes the core paradox of alternative asset managers' market performance.
- At 0:27 - "The superpower of asset management is long duration liabilities, not overnight funds at a bank." - Glenn Schorr explains the fundamental business model advantage that firms like Apollo have.
- At 0:54 - "Every bank said, no turn in the credit cycle, the economy's resilient and the consumer's resilient." - Glenn Schorr points out the contradiction between the positive economic outlook from banks and the poor performance of private credit stocks.
- At 24:08 - "Companies have to take some chances... And when you decide it's not working, you can pull the plug and move on." - Explaining that while Goldman Sachs' consumer banking experiment failed, it was a necessary risk for the company to explore new strategies.
- At 26:27 - "Hats off to James Gorman. Unbelievable." - Praising the CEO of Morgan Stanley for successfully transforming the firm by focusing on asset and wealth management.
- At 31:01 - "Over $600 billion." - Stating the massive amount Bank of America invested in long-duration, low-yield securities, leading to its current balance sheet issues.
- At 35:00 - "That was gutsy because that was Citi's strategy for decades... That's like Steve Eisman not having an opinion." - Commending Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser for her bold decision to exit numerous international consumer banking markets.
- At 39:42 - "Cleaning house is gutsy because there's tradition... now it's, 'Here's... you gotta actually improve operations.'" - Acknowledging the difficulty of Jane Fraser's initial restructuring at Citigroup while pointing out that the next phase is improving performance.
- At 51:41 - "Technology came in the form of an index fund and then eventually an ETF... People don't want to pay for beta, meaning the market, they want to pay for alpha." - Explaining how passive investing products have fundamentally disrupted the business model of traditional active asset managers.
Takeaways
- Be wary when market performance diverges sharply from official company and economic commentary, as it signals a deeper investor concern that may not be publicly acknowledged.
- It is better to admit a strategic failure and pivot back to core competencies than to continue investing in a flawed venture.
- Avoid making massive, concentrated bets on macroeconomic factors like interest rates, as miscalculations can severely impair even the largest institutions.
- Bold leadership that challenges long-standing company tradition is often required to simplify and refocus a complex business for future growth.
- In any industry being disrupted by technology, focus on providing unique, high-value services ("alpha") that cannot be easily commoditized by low-cost alternatives.