Michael Kratsios in conversation with Santi Ruiz

R
Roots of Progress Institute Jan 13, 2026

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode of the podcast explores the critical inversion of American innovation, where private sector R&D spending now vastly dwarfs federal funding, forcing the government to shift its role from primary funder to strategic coordinator. There are three key takeaways from this conversation regarding the physical constraints of AI, the geopolitical battle for the technology stack, and the modernization of scientific funding. First, Artificial Intelligence must be understood as a physical infrastructure crisis rather than merely a software challenge. While AI is often discussed in terms of code and algorithms, the binding constraints on progress are now energy generation, land use, and data center capacity. Consequently, technology policy is rapidly morphing into infrastructure policy. To address this, the government is activating dormant levers, such as utilizing Department of Energy sites and other federal lands to host massive data center build-outs, effectively bypassing private market real estate friction. Second, the United States is pivoting its geopolitical strategy toward exporting the full technology stack. The goal is a concept called Sovereignty via Interdependence. By exporting American chips and base models, the U.S. allows allied nations to build their own local applications while remaining structurally reliant on American rather than Chinese infrastructure. The focus is shifting from simply protecting technology via sanctions to actively promoting it, ensuring that American standards become the global default before competitors can catch up. Third, there is a massive untapped opportunity in what are called Science LLMs. Commercial AI models are trained on the open internet, but the federal government holds vast silos of proprietary, high-quality scientific data within its National Labs. By training specialized AI models on this non-public data—covering physics, materials science, and weather—the government can accelerate actual scientific discovery. This requires moving funding structures off autopilot and diversifying beyond traditional university grants to support focused research organizations that can leverage these unique datasets. In conclusion, maintaining American leadership requires a government that acts as an accelerator for private capital, clearing regulatory paths for energy and infrastructure while deploying its own data assets to drive scientific breakthroughs.

Episode Overview

  • Explores the historical shift in American innovation where private sector R&D spending now vastly exceeds government funding, changing the federal role from "funder" to "coordinator."
  • Frames the current AI revolution not as a software challenge, but as a physical infrastructure crisis requiring massive investments in energy, data centers, and land use.
  • Details the U.S. geopolitical strategy of exporting the entire "tech stack" (chips, models, and apps) to ensure global allies rely on American rather than Chinese infrastructure.
  • Examines internal government levers for accelerating science, including the use of federal lands for data centers and training "Science LLMs" on proprietary government data.

Key Concepts

  • The Inversion of Innovation Funding In the Apollo era, the federal government funded the majority of R&D. Today, the private sector dominates spending. This fundamental shift means effective policy cannot rely on "buying" innovation. Instead, the government must act as an accelerator by removing regulatory barriers and coordinating private capital toward national interests.

  • AI as an Energy and Land Challenge While often discussed as code, the constraint on AI progress is physical. Success depends on the capacity to build data centers and generate electricity. Consequently, technology policy has morphed into infrastructure and land-use policy. To address this, the government is using levers like permitting reform and offering federal land (specifically Department of Energy sites) to host data centers.

  • The "Federated" Science Model Unlike nations with a centralized "Ministry of Science," the U.S. uses a decentralized model where power is spread across agencies (DOE, NSF, NASA). The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) lacks budget authority but uses "convening power" to align these disparate agencies. Success depends on high-level political will to force these agencies to prioritize shared goals like AI infrastructure.

  • Geopolitics of the "Full Stack" National security now relies on which country's technology stack the world adopts. The U.S. strategy involves "Sovereignty via Interdependence": exporting the underlying American infrastructure (chips and base models) so that other nations can build their own local applications on top of it. This allows allies to maintain cultural sovereignty while remaining structurally aligned with the U.S. ecosystem rather than China's.

  • The "Science LLM" Opportunity Commercial AI models are trained on the open internet. However, the federal government possesses vast silos of non-public, high-quality scientific data (material science, weather, physics) within National Labs. A major untapped opportunity lies in training specialized AI models on this proprietary data to accelerate scientific discovery, rather than just consumer applications.

Quotes

  • At 3:44 - "If you go back to the era of... post-World War II, the vast, vast majority of R&D was being funded by the federal government. And over the last 70 years, we've had this inversion or this flip where now the majority of R&D is funded in the private sector." - Explaining why government strategy must shift from spending money to clearing paths for private capital.

  • At 6:33 - "This revolution is going to be powered by electricity and by data centers, and we have to have those built in the United States as quickly as humanly possible." - Identifying the critical physical bottleneck that threatens to stall software advancement.

  • At 10:30 - "We actually do have the very best technology... We have this window of time... where we truly can be... the single powerful supplier of the totality of the stack." - Highlighting the unique strategic opportunity the U.S. has to dominate the global market before competitors catch up.

  • At 17:16 - "We have our own real estate. We have federal lands which can be used for build-outs themselves... The Department of Energy has already announced four locations for build-outs of data centers." - revealing a specific, underutilized government lever to bypass private market real estate friction.

  • At 29:16 - "We have essentially been on kind of this autopilot mode where the same methodologies of choosing which grants and who to fund have essentially been stagnant for many, many years." - Critiquing the outdated, university-centric mechanisms of distributing scientific funding.

  • At 35:09 - "The Science LLMs need to be trained on science data. And that's far more siloed and not necessarily in the public domain... there's data there that can be tapped into to drive this science." - Identifying the government's specific comparative advantage in the AI era: access to proprietary scientific datasets.

Takeaways

  • Shift Policy Focus from "Protect" to "Promote" Do not rely solely on sanctions or export controls to win geopolitical competition. Actively flood the global market with cost-competitive, superior American technology stacks to ensure developing nations adopt U.S. standards rather than Chinese alternatives.

  • Treat AI as an Infrastructure Project Stop viewing AI development solely through the lens of software regulation. Prioritize deregulation of energy production, grid expansion, and land permitting to support the physical reality of data centers required for the next generation of models.

  • Modernize Scientific Funding Structures Move scientific funding off "autopilot." Diversify beyond traditional university grants by funding Focused Research Organizations (FROs) and fast-tracking initiatives that utilize government data silos to train specialized "Science LLMs."