"Mein Kampf is boring" | Slavoj Žižek and Hilary Lawson on Truth, Trump, and Nazis
Audio Brief
Show transcript
This episode covers a debate between philosophers Slavoj Žižek and Hilary Lawson on the dangerous nature of political belief and the philosophical concept of reality itself.
There are three key takeaways to consider from their discussion. First, political leaders often operate in a paradoxical state where they simultaneously know they are lying and yet believe their own lies. Second, the search for a single, objective reality may actually lead to dangerous dogmatism and totalitarianism. And third, our social world is structured by objective illusions, where we intellectually reject certain beliefs but perpetuate them through our actions.
To expand on the first point, Žižek argues against the simple idea that dictators or populist leaders are merely cynical manipulators. Using examples like Hitler and Stalin, he suggests a mechanism of disavowal. These figures know the facts are false, yet they act as if the lie is real. This complexity extends to modern figures like Donald Trump, where followers often perceive a leader's blatant lying not as deception, but as a form of authentic sincerity. They support the leader not despite the lies, but because the performance of lying feels more real than dry facts.
Regarding the nature of truth, Hilary Lawson proposes a radical shift. He compares the concept of an ultimate, discoverable reality to a dead God unobtainable and indescribable. Instead of seeking this absolute truth, Lawson suggests we focus on closure. This is the idea that we frame the world to make sense of it, but these frames are always incomplete. He warns that clinging to the notion of a single reality is what fuels authoritarian regimes, as they claim to possess the final truth.
Finally, the conversation turns to the Marxist concept of objective illusion. Žižek explains that illusions are not just errors in our minds but are embedded in social structures. For instance, we know money is just paper, yet we treat it as having magical value. We might be cynical about political rituals or economic systems, but by participating in them, we sustain their reality. The danger lies in thinking our cynical distance protects us, when in fact, our actions continue to support the very systems we claim to disbelieve.
Ultimately, this debate challenges us to recognize that our perspective is merely a necessary framing of the world, not the final truth, and to examine how our daily actions might betray our intellectual beliefs.
Episode Overview
- This discussion features philosopher Slavoj Žižek and post-realist philosopher Hilary Lawson debating the nature of truth, reality, and political belief systems.
- The central conflict revolves around whether we should abandon the concept of an ultimate "reality" in favor of "closure" (Lawson's view) or if we must acknowledge the complex interplay of cynical distance and genuine belief in ideology (Žižek's view).
- The speakers use historical examples—including Stalinism, Hitler, and the Catholic Church—as well as modern political figures like Donald Trump to illustrate how leaders and followers navigate lies, fiction, and objective reality.
Key Concepts
- The Paradox of Belief: Žižek argues that political figures like Hitler or Stalin simultaneously know they are lying and believe in their own lies. This "disavowal" allows them to function; they know the truth but act as if the lie is real. Similarly, followers often know a leader is lying (e.g., Trump), but this knowledge reinforces their support because it is perceived as "sincerity" or "authenticity."
- Closure vs. Reality: Lawson proposes that we should abandon the search for an ultimate, objective "reality" (which he compares to a dead God) and instead focus on "closure"—how we frame the world to make sense of it. He argues that clinging to the idea of a single, discoverable truth leads to dangerous dogmatism and totalitarianism.
- Objective Illusion: Žižek introduces the Marxist concept that illusions are not just errors in our heads but are embedded in social reality itself. For example, we might know money is just paper, but we act as if it has magical value. The system functions because of this "objective illusion," meaning reality itself is structured by fictions we collectively follow.
Quotes
- At 0:36 - "The only consistent answer is: Yes and No." - Žižek explaining the complex psychological state of totalitarian leaders regarding whether they know they are deceiving the public.
- At 5:30 - "It is time now that we killed reality. It has exactly the same character as God... it is both unobtainable and indescribable." - Lawson arguing for the abandonment of "reality" as a philosophical anchor.
- At 10:40 - "You are not an idiot. You even know it's not true, but in your activity, you follow it." - Žižek summarizing the concept of "objective illusion" or commodity fetishism, where action contradicts knowledge.
Takeaways
- Be skeptical of political "sincerity" or "authenticity," as these traits often mask a sophisticated form of lying where the liar believes their own fiction while simultaneously knowing it is false.
- Avoid the trap of thinking you have discovered the single, final "truth" of the world; instead, recognize that your perspective is a "closure"—a necessary but incomplete framing of the world that should remain open to revision.
- Examine your own actions to identify "objective illusions"—behaviors you participate in that perpetuate systems or beliefs you intellectually reject (e.g., participating in economic or social rituals you claim to be cynical about).
More from The Institute of Art and Ideas
Why we never learn from history | John Gray on the illusion of progress
Feb 17, 2026
Why nationalism won't go away | Alain de Botton, Alex O'Connor, Tommy Curry, Seyla Benhabib
Feb 10, 2026
HowTheLightGetsIn Hay 2026 | Festival Trailer Premiere
Feb 05, 2026
Nicola Sturgeon has a lot to be frank about | EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW
Feb 02, 2026