Lp(a) and Aspirin: What You Need to Know | Thomas Dayspring | The Proof Shorts EP #320
Audio Brief
Show transcript
This episode discusses the evolving medical perspective on prescribing aspirin for individuals with elevated Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a). The discussion highlights refined understandings from key studies.
There are three key takeaways from this discussion. These cover personalized therapy, genetic markers, and evidence-based thresholds.
Early thinking supported aspirin due to Lp(a)'s prothrombotic nature. Subsequent studies, including Women's Health, ASPREE, and MESA, refined this understanding.
Aspirin's effectiveness is not universal. A specific genetic marker (SNP) strongly predicts individual response, influencing who benefits.
The MESA study indicated Lp(a) levels above 50 mg/dL, with the specific SNP, correlate with a 30-40% reduction in cardiovascular events. Therapy must always consider contraindications and potential side effects.
This nuanced approach aims for more targeted and effective cardiovascular risk management. Such personalization optimizes patient outcomes.
Episode Overview
- The speaker discusses the evolving medical perspective on prescribing aspirin for individuals with elevated Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)].
- He explains that early thinking supported aspirin use because Lp(a) is a prothrombotic protein, which promotes blood clotting.
- The discussion highlights several key studies (Women's Health Study, ASPREE, and MESA) that have refined the understanding of who benefits most from this therapy.
- The latest evidence points to aspirin being particularly effective for individuals with a specific genetic marker (SNP) and Lp(a) levels above a certain threshold.
Key Concepts
- Lp(a) as a Prothrombotic Protein: The video explains that Lp(a) can increase the tendency for blood to clot. This property was the initial rationale for recommending aspirin, an anti-platelet agent, to counteract this risk.
- Genetic Personalization (SNPs): The effectiveness of aspirin for those with high Lp(a) is not universal. The speaker emphasizes the role of a specific Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP), a genetic variation, which determines whether a patient will respond positively to aspirin therapy.
- Clinical Study Evidence: The speaker traces the evolution of evidence through three major studies: the Women's Health Study, the ASPREE study, and most recently, the MESA study. Each study added a layer of specificity to the initial hypothesis.
- Treatment Thresholds: The MESA study provided a clear, quantitative guideline, suggesting that people with Lp(a) levels above 50 mg/dL experienced a significant reduction in cardiovascular events when taking aspirin.
Quotes
- At 00:39 - "But if you didn't have that SNP, aspirin did nothing to preventing events in women." - The speaker explains the nuanced findings from the Women's Health Study, showing that aspirin's benefit was dependent on a specific genetic marker.
- At 01:26 - "And lo and behold, people with an Lp(a) above 50 milligrams per deciliter had a dramatic 30% to 40% reduction by aspirin use." - He summarizes the definitive findings from the MESA study, which established a clear threshold for aspirin's effectiveness.
Takeaways
- Aspirin therapy for elevated Lp(a) should be personalized rather than universally recommended.
- The presence of a specific genetic marker (SNP) is a strong predictor of whether an individual will benefit from aspirin.
- According to the MESA study, individuals with Lp(a) levels over 50 mg/dL may see a 30-40% reduction in cardiovascular events with aspirin use.
- The decision to start aspirin must also consider contraindications and potential side effects, such as stomach irritation or increased bruising.