Designing Teaching & Understanding Learners with Dylan Wiliam, Mind the Gap, Ep. 55 (S3E11)
Audio Brief
Show transcript
This episode delves into the profound complexity of teaching, challenging conventional views on what constitutes effective instruction and how student learning should be assessed.
There are four key takeaways from this conversation. First, long-term learning, not short-term performance, is the true measure of teaching effectiveness. Second, assessment should be decision-driven data collection, not data-driven decision making. Third, teaching must be a contingent and responsive process, adapting to real-time student understanding. Fourth, effective leadership involves "de-implementation," strategically stopping good practices to make way for better ones.
Initial student performance in a lesson often proves a poor indicator of true learning and long-term retention. Students frequently forget material that appeared understood immediately after instruction. Cognitive Load Theory helps explain why students may perform well but fail to retain information, highlighting the counter-intuitive nature of effective learning.
Teachers should shift from "data-driven decision making" to a more efficient "decision-driven data collection." This means first identifying an instructional decision that needs to be made, and only then collecting the specific, minimal data required to inform that choice. This reframes formative assessment as a targeted, responsive practice.
Teaching should evolve from a linear process of curriculum coverage to a contingent one that adapts to real-time evidence of student understanding. This approach uses continuous feedback from learners, teachers, and peers to adjust instruction dynamically. It moves beyond simply delivering content to genuinely meeting student needs.
Effective leadership requires strategic "de-implementation," which means consciously stopping good but less impactful practices. This creates the necessary time and capacity for educators to adopt and focus on even better, higher-impact teaching methods. It is about prioritizing impact and continuous improvement.
These insights underscore the complexity of effective teaching and the need for a deliberate, adaptive approach to fostering genuine learning.
Episode Overview
- The episode explores the profound complexity of teaching, challenging the notion that one can easily identify "good teaching" simply by observing a lesson.
- It clarifies the difference between broad Assessment for Learning (AfL) and the specific, responsive practice of Formative Assessment, critiquing how early bureaucratic implementations tarnished the concept.
- A core theme is the proposed shift from "data-driven decision making" to a more efficient "decision-driven data collection" model, reframing teaching as a contingent rather than a linear process.
- The conversation highlights the crucial role of cognitive load theory in understanding why students might perform well in a lesson but fail to retain the information long-term.
- It concludes with the concept of "de-implementation"—the strategic necessity for school leaders to stop good practices to make time for even better, higher-impact ones.
Key Concepts
- Performance vs. Learning: The immediate performance of students during a lesson is a poor proxy for long-term learning and retention.
- The Complexity of Teaching: Effective teaching is an incredibly intricate process, and its success should not be taken for granted or judged superficially.
- Decision-Driven Data Collection: Teachers should start by identifying an instructional decision they need to make, and only then collect the specific data required to inform that choice.
- Teaching as a Contingent Process: The focus of teaching must shift from simply "covering the curriculum" in a linear fashion to a responsive process that adapts to real-time evidence of student understanding.
- Formative Assessment: A specific practice where evidence of learning is used by teachers, learners, and peers to make real-time adjustments to teaching and learning to better meet student needs.
- The Tarnished Legacy of AfL: The early, bureaucratic implementation of Assessment for Learning in the UK created a negative perception, associating it with excessive workload rather than improved teaching.
- Cognitive Load Theory: This is presented as the single most important theory for teachers, as it explains the counter-intuitive phenomenon of students performing well but not learning, and why certain instructional methods can widen achievement gaps.
- De-implementation: The essential leadership practice of strategically stopping good but less effective activities to create the time and capacity for higher-impact practices.
Quotes
- At 3:44 - "...it's if the Men in Black have come along with their neuralyzers and erased any content of that lesson from the kids' brains." - Wiliam uses this analogy to illustrate how easily students forget material from a lesson that may have appeared successful at the time.
- At 23:19 - "shifting away from data-driven decision making towards decision-driven data collection." - Dylan Wiliam articulating the core principle that the instructional decision should determine what data is collected, not the other way around.
- At 24:21 - "a shift in teaching from being a linear process to being a contingent one." - Dylan Wiliam summarizing the change in mindset required for responsive teaching, where a teacher's next steps depend on evidence of student learning.
- At 29:57 - "Cognitive load theory is the most important theory that teachers should know about." - Dylan Wiliam explaining that its importance lies in being counter-intuitive and explaining the paradox of students performing well but not learning long-term.
- At 48:03 - "The essence of effective leadership is to stop teachers doing good things to give them time to do even better things." - Dylan Wiliam defining the concept of "de-implementation" and the importance of focusing on high-impact practices by eliminating lower-impact ones.
Takeaways
- Prioritize evidence of long-term learning over short-term performance when evaluating teaching effectiveness.
- Reframe assessment by first asking, "What decision do I need to make?" and then gathering only the evidence needed to make it.
- Shift your teaching mindset from delivering a pre-planned sequence to a flexible, contingent process that adapts based on student understanding.
- To improve practice, strategically stop doing good-but-less-effective things to make time for what is proven to be better.