Comitê de Alocação Brasil | Novembro 2025

X
XP Nov 18, 2025

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode covers the US Federal Reserve's ambiguous policy shifts, contained US credit risks, and Brazil's surprising economic resilience and asset allocation implications. There are three key takeaways from this conversation. First, the US Federal Reserve's policy is now highly flexible and data-dependent, requiring market caution. Second, US credit market stress is confined to specific sectors and does not pose a systemic threat. Third, Brazil's economy shows unexpected resilience, fueled by fiscal stimulus and leading to tactical shifts in asset allocation. The Federal Reserve has pivoted from a clear "cut, cut, cut" narrative to a more ambiguous, data-driven stance. This leaves markets uncertain about its reaction function, especially as growth and inflation projections have paradoxically risen alongside initial rate cuts. Investors must approach Fed guidance with caution, anticipating quick policy shifts based on new economic data. Deterioration in US credit is evident in specific segments, notably Business Development Companies and smaller regional banks. However, analysts conclude this risk is isolated and does not pose a systemic threat, differentiating it from widespread crises like 2008. The estimated 65 billion dollar loss in BDCs, for instance, is considered manageable within the broader financial system. Brazil's economy is outperforming consensus estimates, driven by strength in manufacturing, services, and a robust labor market. Real-time indicators like heavy vehicle traffic and services sector data confirm this strong pulse. A significant increase in government spending, concentrated in the second half of the year, is the primary engine boosting activity beyond market expectations. This powerful fiscal impulse, along with significant foreign investment inflows, creates complex challenges for Brazil's monetary policy. There is a notable debate over the neutral interest rate, with XP Asset's models suggesting a significantly higher rate than the Central Bank's five percent assumption. This reflects the underlying tension from expansive fiscal policy, which necessitates a high neutral rate to control long-term inflation. Moreover, there is skepticism towards the Central Bank's official economic models, which may contain discretionary adjustments painting an overly optimistic picture. While political pressure and favorable short-term inflation data could lead to interest rate cuts, underlying fundamentals remain challenging. Given the attractive equity risk premium relative to compressed credit spreads, tactical portfolio shifts are now favoring Brazilian equities over credit assets. These insights highlight critical shifts in global monetary policy and emerging market dynamics, demanding careful consideration from investors.

Episode Overview

  • The podcast analyzes the US Federal Reserve's confusing policy signals, which have shifted from a predictable rate-cutting cycle to a more uncertain, data-dependent stance, creating market confusion.
  • It assesses credit risks in the US market, concluding that while problems exist in Business Development Companies (BDCs) and small regional banks, they are contained and do not pose a systemic threat.
  • The discussion presents a counter-consensus view that Brazil's economy is surprisingly resilient, driven by a massive fiscal stimulus in the second half of the year that is boosting activity beyond market expectations.
  • Finally, it explores the implications of this economic strength for Brazil's monetary policy, highlighting the debate over the neutral interest rate and detailing a tactical portfolio shift towards Brazilian equities.

Key Concepts

  • US Monetary Policy Uncertainty: The Federal Reserve's pivot away from a clear "cut, cut, cut" narrative towards a more ambiguous and flexible policy stance, leaving markets unsure of its reaction function.
  • Concentrated Credit Risk: The identification of credit deterioration in specific US market segments, namely Business Development Companies (BDCs) and smaller regional banks, as opposed to a widespread, systemic issue.
  • Systemic vs. Non-Systemic Events: A framework used to differentiate contained financial problems from those large enough to threaten the entire system, comparing the current BDC issue (est. $65B loss) to the 2008 crisis (over $700B loss).
  • Brazilian Economic Resilience: The core thesis that Brazil's economy is outperforming consensus forecasts, supported by strength in the manufacturing and services sectors, as well as a robust labor market.
  • Fiscal Impulse as a Growth Driver: The recognition that a significant increase in government spending concentrated in the second half of the year is the primary engine behind Brazil's better-than-expected economic activity.
  • Critique of Central Bank Models: The argument that Brazil's Central Bank is making discretionary adjustments to its output gap ("hiato do produto") models, potentially leading to overly optimistic inflation forecasts.
  • Neutral Interest Rate ("Juro Neutro") Debate: The major discrepancy between the Central Bank's official 5% neutral rate assumption and XP's model-driven calculation of 8.3%, which reflects the tension created by expansive fiscal policy.
  • Tactical Asset Allocation: The strategic decision to increase exposure to Brazilian Equities while reducing positions in credit assets, justified by the more attractive equity risk premium relative to compressed credit spreads.

Quotes

  • At 0:37 - "Sempre trazendo uma atualização do cenário global... tivemos recentemente mais uma reunião do Banco Central Americano, que cortou mais uma vez os juros, trouxe uma dúvida em relação à reunião de dezembro." - Victória Tofolo introduces the uncertainty created by the US Federal Reserve's recent actions.
  • At 2:16 - "A gente vai falar um pouco do FED, e se teve uma nova mudança na função de reação do FED." - Arthur Wichmann introduces the central theme of whether the US Federal Reserve has altered its policy-making approach.
  • At 2:23 - "O FED começou esse ciclo de uma forma relativamente controversa, onde ele aumenta as projeções de inflação, aumenta as projeções de crescimento e começa o ciclo de corte de juros." - Wichmann describes the initial rate cuts as confusing because they occurred alongside upward revisions for inflation and growth.
  • At 21:48 - "Eles divulgam hoje um PDD de 1%. Mentira, gente, não é 1% de jeito nenhum, aposto com vocês, entendeu, a hipoteca da minha casa que não é 1% esse PDD." - The speaker emphatically dismisses the officially reported loss provisions for Business Development Companies (BDCs) as unrealistic.
  • At 22:30 - "É ruim? É. É sistêmico? Não. Então essa aqui talvez seja a mensagem principal." - The speaker delivers his main conclusion that the BDC issue is problematic but does not pose a systemic risk.
  • At 23:44 - "Sim, existe um problema, ele é circunscrito aos Business Development Corporations, aos fundos de crédito e aos pequenos bancos. Não, ele não é um problema sistêmico." - He summarizes his assessment that US credit problems are contained within specific, non-systemic sectors.
  • At 24:08 - "Vamos tratar agora do elefante na sala, né? Poxa, tem ou não tem bolha?" - The speaker transitions the discussion to the highly debated topic of a potential market bubble.
  • At 49:32 - "Eu continuo com a nossa cabeça de uma atividade melhor que o consenso no segundo semestre." - The speaker reaffirms his team's belief that Brazil's economic activity in the second half of the year will outperform market expectations.
  • At 52:43 - "A gente vê um quarto trimestre mais forte do que um terceiro trimestre. Isso aqui é algo que é bem contrário ao consenso, tá?" - He presents his forecast for Q4 GDP, highlighting that it contradicts the general market expectation of a slowdown.
  • At 56:30 - "E que mostra um novo crescimento, uma nova surpresa no mercado em setembro." - Referring to the services sector data, he points out its continued strength and how it has once again surprised the market.
  • At 1:02:00 - "Essa semana a gente teve a prévia dos dados fiscais do mês de outubro... a gente vê o gasto crescendo 9% acima da inflação." - He highlights the substantial real-term increase in government spending, underscoring the powerful fiscal impulse.
  • At 1:03:09 - "O Banco Central, de algum tempo para cá... deixou de usar o hiato do produto que é gerado pelo seu modelo só, e começou a fazer ajustes discricionários." - He critiques the Central Bank's methodology, arguing they are making discretionary adjustments to their models to achieve more optimistic conclusions.
  • At 76:25 - "Que que é o juro neutro? Juro neutro é a taxa de juros que leva o PIB pro potencial, ou seja, que faz com que o hiato do produto... vá para zero e que a inflação vá para a meta." - The speaker defines the economic concept of the neutral interest rate.
  • At 77:09 - "O nosso modelo chega em 8,3." - The speaker contrasts the Central Bank's 5% neutral rate assumption with the much higher result from XP Asset's economic model.
  • At 77:42 - "Eu acho que ele mesmo não, não acredita nesses 5%." - The speaker expresses skepticism that the Central Bank itself believes in its stated 5% neutral interest rate, given its hawkish policy actions.
  • At 79:31 - "Se a gente mantiver uma política fiscal em que o gasto vai crescer sempre acima do PIB potencial, esse é o juro." - The speaker directly links continued government spending growth above potential GDP to a persistently high neutral interest rate.
  • At 96:37 - "Os spreads que a gente tá vendo no mercado de crédito não justificam correr o risco de crédito. Então eu prefiro correr o risco de ações, dado o equity risk premium." - Arthur Wichmann explains the tactical decision to shift allocation from credit to equities based on relative valuation.
  • At 98:02 - "Acho que isso é muito circunscrito a uma instituição financeira específica, até onde a gente sabe." - Arthur Wichmann comments on a recent bank issue in Brazil, stating his belief that it does not represent a systemic risk.

Takeaways

  • Approach the US Federal Reserve's guidance with caution, as its policy function is flexible and can pivot quickly based on new data.
  • Recognize that US credit market stress is currently confined to specific sectors like BDCs and small banks, rather than indicating a systemic threat.
  • Expect Brazil's economy to outperform consensus estimates in the short term, primarily due to a powerful and concentrated fiscal stimulus.
  • Monitor real-time indicators like heavy vehicle traffic and services sector data for an accurate pulse on the strength of the Brazilian economy.
  • Maintain a degree of skepticism towards official economic models from Brazil's Central Bank, which may contain adjustments that paint an overly optimistic picture.
  • Understand that Brazil's current fiscal policy necessitates a high neutral interest rate, creating a long-term challenge for controlling inflation.
  • Anticipate that political pressure and favorable short-term inflation data could lead Brazil's Central Bank to begin cutting interest rates, even if underlying fundamentals remain challenging.
  • Evaluate shifting portfolio allocation towards Brazilian equities, as they may offer a more attractive risk premium compared to tightening credit spreads.
  • Acknowledge that significant foreign investment inflows are a key tailwind and a major driver of positive performance for Brazilian assets.
  • Differentiate between isolated issues at specific financial institutions in Brazil and a systemic banking crisis, as the latter is not currently a concern.