Closing: A Culture of Progress

R
Roots of Progress Institute Jan 22, 2026

Audio Brief

Show transcript
This episode covers Jason Crawford's closing remarks from the Progress Conference 2025, where he outlines the core themes of his upcoming work, The Techno-Humanist Manifesto. There are three key takeaways from this discussion. First, culture acts as the primary driver of talent allocation rather than just economics. Second, there is a critical need for industrial literacy in education. And third, society must actively redirect ambitious young people toward frontier problems rather than safe, legacy career paths. Crawford argues that cultural narratives determine where a society's best and brightest apply their intelligence. If a culture values theology or performative activism over mechanics and building, talent will flow away from the hard problems required to sustain civilization. To counter this, he proposes a new talent pipeline built on industrial literacy. Students need to understand the history and mechanics of how the modern world functions—from supply chains to energy grids—to see themselves as contributors to human progress rather than just critics of the system. The discussion emphasizes that young talent often defaults to safe paths like big pharma simply because they lack awareness of high-leverage fields. Crawford suggests a strategic shift in media and mentorship to explicitly signal-boost neglected areas like biosecurity, nuclear energy, and longevity research. By reframing engineering and business as noble moral obligations, society can steer talent toward solving stagnation and dismantling the regulatory obstructions that currently hinder physical growth. This is a call to view cultural reform not as a luxury, but as an essential upstream input for scientific and economic advancement.

Episode Overview

  • This episode features the closing remarks from the Progress Conference 2025 by Jason Crawford, founder of the Roots of Progress Institute, where he outlines the core themes of his upcoming book, "The Techno-Humanist Manifesto."
  • The discussion centers on the "Progress Agenda," specifically arguing that cultural narratives are not merely downstream of economics but are actually the primary drivers of scientific and technological advancement.
  • Crawford presents a compelling vision for a new "talent pipeline" designed to steer ambitious young people away from performative activism and legacy industries, and toward solving frontier problems like biosecurity, clean energy, and longevity.

Key Concepts

  • The Three Pillars of the Progress Agenda: Crawford argues that advancing humanity requires focus in three specific cause areas:

    1. Abundance (Legal/Regulatory): Dismantling "vetocracy" and removing obstructions to physical building and growth.
    2. Metascience (Institutional): Reforming how scientific research is organized, managed, and funded to break stagnation.
    3. Culture: Cultivating a philosophy that views science, engineering, and business as noble quests to improve the human condition.
  • Culture Drives Talent Allocation: Contrary to the materialist view that technology unfolds automatically based on economic resources (e.g., cheap coal driving the Industrial Revolution), Crawford posits that culture determines what a society's "best and brightest" choose to work on. If a culture values theological debate over mechanics, smart people will become priests, not engineers; if it values activism over building, they will become protesters rather than founders.

  • The Gap in Frontier Awareness: Young talent often defaults to "safe" or socially approved paths (e.g., working for big pharma or advocating for standard solar power) because they are never exposed to frontier solutions. They lack awareness of high-leverage but stigmatized or "weird" fields like solar radiation management, curing aging, or nuclear energy, simply because their educational and social environments do not present these as viable or high-status career paths.

  • Industrial Literacy: A proposed foundational educational requirement where students learn the history and mechanics of how industrial civilization functions—from supply chains to energy grids. Understanding the "hockey stick" charts of GDP growth and poverty reduction provides the context necessary for students to see themselves as potential contributors to that continuity, rather than just critics of the system.

Quotes

  • At 4:12 - "What matters clearly is culture and institutions. Culture determines preferences and priorities... cultural factors determined whether the best and brightest in each society will tinker with machines and chemicals, or whether they will perfect their swordplay or study the Talmud." - Illustrating, via economic historian Joel Mokyr, that intelligence alone does not create progress; societal incentives determine where that intelligence is applied.
  • At 6:06 - "If you are interested in health, you are much more likely to hear about something like curing cancer... you are much less likely to hear about curing aging. ... You probably, if you're the average teenager, haven't heard about opportunities in nanotechnology, or in far-UVC light for biosecurity." - Explaining how social norms filter the career options young people perceive, often blinding them to the most transformative but unconventional opportunities.
  • At 10:10 - "Tech news covers what people are doing in tech... I think there should be a publication that covers what people ought to be doing. Map out the frontier, talk about what the biggest opportunities are... and if nobody's doing it, call it out as a neglected area." - Proposing a shift in media from passive reporting to active agenda-setting to guide human agency toward neglected problems.

Takeaways

  • Build "Industrial Literacy" curriculums: Educators and parents should actively teach young people the history of economic growth and the operational realities of modern civilization to counter cynicism and inspire a desire to build.
  • Signal boost neglected problems: When mentoring or advising talent, explicitly direct attention toward "weird" or frontier fields (like longevity research or geoengineering) that lack social reinforcement but offer high leverage for humanity.
  • Reframe career choices as moral imperatives: Shift the cultural conversation to view engineering, business, and scientific research not just as jobs, but as noble moral obligations required to maintain and improve human living standards.